MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3006188233 · doi:10.1109/lcn44214.2019.8990851

Container-based Real-time Video Transcoding

2019· article· en· W3006188233 on OpenAlexaff
Sajad Sameti, Mea Wang, Diwakar Krishnamurthy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranscodingComputer scienceCoding (social sciences)Quality of experienceContainer (type theory)Real-time computingMultimediaComputer networkQuality of service

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the ever growing popularity of video services, maintaining high Quality of Experience (QoE) of the end users with heterogeneous devices and network conditions is becoming more challenging. Each user requires content that matches with their device capability and network conditions. This motivates the need for flexible video transcoding, which enables changing the properties of videos on-the-fly to fit different users. However, the transcoding process is compute intensive especially when handling modern video coding standards such as High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) and supporting emerging applications such as live broadcasts. Consequently, there is a need for lightweight and resource-efficient systems that can perform transcoding quickly at real-time to sustain desired user QoE requirements. We design and implement a container-based video transcoding system to address this need. We experimentally show that our system can meet real-time transcoding while using less computational resources than a native transcoding approach. Our work also identifies container and transcoder parameters that can impact the overall performance of the proposed system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207