MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3006242490 · doi:10.1139/cjss2012-070

Effects of liquid hog manure on soil available nitrogen status, nitrogen leaching losses and wheat yield on a sandy loam soil of western Canada

2013· article· en· W3006242490 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBioOne Complete (BioOne) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeaching (pedology)AgronomyLoamManureEnvironmental scienceLysimeterSoil waterNitrogenStrawChemistrySoil scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nikièma, P., Buckley, K. E., Enns, J. M., Qiang, H. and Akinremi, O. O. 2013. Effects of liquid hog manure on soil available nitrogen status, nitrogen leaching losses and wheat yield on a sandy loam soil of western Canada. Can. J. Soil Sci. 93: 573-584. Manure can improve soil quality and enhance crop yields. However, excessive manure use may contribute to nitrate leaching, particularly on coarse-textured soils. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of liquid hog manure (LHM) on wheat yield, soil available N and leaching on a sandy soil in Manitoba. Manure treatments included three rates of LHM applied to supply 64 (low), 128 (medium) and 192 kg N ha-1 (high) in 3 consecutive years (2002-2004). Unamended plots were used as a control. Available nitrogen was measured three times during each growing season at soil depths of 0-15, 15-30, 30-60, 60-90, and 90-120 cm. Undisturbed soil core lysimeters were used to measure leaching. Crop yields (grain and straw), N-uptake and N use efficiency were assessed at the end of each growing season. In 2002 and 2003, LHM had little effect on wheat yield, N nutrition and leaching due to below-normal rainfall in both years. In contrast, in 2004 when precipitation was above normal, LHM amendment increased grain yield and plant N-uptake. Relative to the control, grain yield was 20, 30 and 50% greater in the low, medium and high manure-N plots, respectively. Manure increased soil available N concentration 1.2-, 1.3- and 1.7-fold and induced additional -N leaching of 4.7, 28.4 and 54.5 kg ha-1 in the low, medium and high manure-N plots, respectively. Results suggest that LHM should be used with caution on sandy soils due to leaching potential in years of high precipitation and low crop yields in years of low precipitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.863

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.108 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it