Bilissel Egzersiz Terapi Yaklasımı Olceginin Diz Osteoartrit Tanısı Alan Bireylerde Gecerligi, Guvenirligi ve Duyarlılıgının Belirlenmesi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BULUT, Z.İ., Determination of the Validity, Reliability and Responsiveness of the Cognitive Exercise Therapy Approach Scale in Patients with a Diagnosis of Knee Osteoarthritis, Hacettepe University Graduate School of Health Sciences Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Program Master of Science Thesis, Ankara, 2020. This study was planned to investigate the validity, reliability and sensitivity of the Cognitive Exercise Therapy Approach (BETY) scale in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA). The study included 150 individuals who diagnosed knee osteoarthritis at stage 1 or 2 according to the Kellgren-Lawrence scale. For determining daily living activities; Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), for quality of life Short Form-36 (SF-36) Quality of Life Scale, for anxiety and depression levels; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), for severity of disease Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and for biopsychosocial evaluation BETY Scale were used. The correlation between BETY Scale and other scales was examined by Spearman correlation analysis (r=-0.252, 0.633, p<0,05). Cronbach's alpha coefficient and item-total correlation were used as reliability methods. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was examined for the internal consistency of the scale and was found to be 0.887 for the first evaluation, 0.917 for measurements after 1 week and 0.843 for measurements after 3 months. Item total correlation, which was another indicator of reliability, ranged from 0.632 to 0.854 (p<0.05). For investigating responsiveness of BETY scale; Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test was used to examine the change in the results of the scales, which are most frequently used scales in knee OA, completed after 3 months with the first measurement of the BETY scale. As a result of our study, it was concluded that BETY scale was valid, reliable and responsible in individuals with knee OA diagnosis. This result showed that BETY scale can be used in clinics to evaluate biopsychosocial involvement and treatment effect in individuals with OA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".