MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3006468850

Bilissel Egzersiz Terapi Yaklasımı Olceginin Diz Osteoartrit Tanısı Alan Bireylerde Gecerligi, Guvenirligi ve Duyarlılıgının Belirlenmesi

2020· dissertation· tr· W3006468850 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHacettepe University Institutional Repository (hacettepe.edu.tr) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languagetr
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDermatoglyphics and Human Traits
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGynecologyPsychologyMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BULUT, Z.İ., Determination of the Validity, Reliability and Responsiveness of the Cognitive Exercise Therapy Approach Scale in Patients with a Diagnosis of Knee Osteoarthritis, Hacettepe University Graduate School of Health Sciences Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Program Master of Science Thesis, Ankara, 2020. This study was planned to investigate the validity, reliability and sensitivity of the Cognitive Exercise Therapy Approach (BETY) scale in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA). The study included 150 individuals who diagnosed knee osteoarthritis at stage 1 or 2 according to the Kellgren-Lawrence scale. For determining daily living activities; Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), for quality of life Short Form-36 (SF-36) Quality of Life Scale, for anxiety and depression levels; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), for severity of disease Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and for biopsychosocial evaluation BETY Scale were used. The correlation between BETY Scale and other scales was examined by Spearman correlation analysis (r=-0.252, 0.633, p<0,05). Cronbach's alpha coefficient and item-total correlation were used as reliability methods. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was examined for the internal consistency of the scale and was found to be 0.887 for the first evaluation, 0.917 for measurements after 1 week and 0.843 for measurements after 3 months. Item total correlation, which was another indicator of reliability, ranged from 0.632 to 0.854 (p<0.05). For investigating responsiveness of BETY scale; Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test was used to examine the change in the results of the scales, which are most frequently used scales in knee OA, completed after 3 months with the first measurement of the BETY scale. As a result of our study, it was concluded that BETY scale was valid, reliable and responsible in individuals with knee OA diagnosis. This result showed that BETY scale can be used in clinics to evaluate biopsychosocial involvement and treatment effect in individuals with OA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.521
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it