MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007592021 · doi:10.1002/eng2.12128

A Markovian reliability approach for offshore wind energy system analysis in harsh environments

2020· article· en· W3007592021 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Reports · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicRisk and Safety Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDowntimeReliability engineeringReliability (semiconductor)Fault tree analysisMarkov processComputer scienceRemedial actionProcess (computing)System dynamicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract For an effective monitoring strategy of offshore energy systems in harsh environments, it is vital the system reliability dynamics be fully understood. This article presents the application of a Markovian process for dynamic reliability prediction of an offshore energy system. In the proposed approach, a three‐state Markovian process is developed for the analysis of the subsystem states, which dynamically determines the overall system reliability performance, overcoming the static limitation of fault tree analysis. The multistate subsystems are discretized into normal, degraded, and failed states to demonstrate the performance dynamics of the system for condition monitoring. The proposed approach is tested on a case study and the most critical influencing elements are identified. The application of the methodology efficiently identifies the system vulnerability path so as to assist in system integrity management and to provide a guide to early remedial action against total failure and downtime in offshore energy generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score0.664

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it