MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007703757 · doi:10.4000/e-spania.33997

Dinámicas de poder y textos normativos en las fronteras coloniales. Estudio de las ordenanzas promulgadas para el gobierno de las misiones jesuitas de Nueva Vizcaya entre 1610 y 1710

2020· article· es· W3007703757 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuee-Spania · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicColonialism, slavery, and trade
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Desde una perspectiva de historia social, el artículo analiza las ordenanzas promulgadas a lo largo del siglo XVII para el gobierno de la red de misiones de la Compañía de Jesús en Nueva Vizcaya. Esta serie de corpus legislativos regulaba las relaciones entre los distintos actores sociales presentes en esta provincia situada en los confines septentrionales de los territorios americanos de la monarquía hispánica: misioneros, poblaciones autóctonas y otros –militares, hacendados, etc.–. Además de evidenciar la especificidad fronteriza de la región, el interés del estudio de estas normas reside en brindarnos la posibilidad de observar las acomodaciones entre el ideal misionero y la práctica, de entrever el modo en el que se aplicaba la ley y de ahí, en cierto sentido, la vida en la misión y de establecer comparaciones con otros espacios misioneros (Brasil, Paraguay). Finalmente, las ordenanzas invitan a reflexionar sobre el lugar que ocupó la legislación misionera en el proceso de construcción imperial de la monarquía católica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it