MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007703757 · doi:10.4000/e-spania.33997

Dinámicas de poder y textos normativos en las fronteras coloniales. Estudio de las ordenanzas promulgadas para el gobierno de las misiones jesuitas de Nueva Vizcaya entre 1610 y 1710

2020· article· es· W3007703757 on OpenAlexaff
Amaia Cabranes

Bibliographic record

Venuee-Spania · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicColonialism, slavery, and trade
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Desde una perspectiva de historia social, el artículo analiza las ordenanzas promulgadas a lo largo del siglo XVII para el gobierno de la red de misiones de la Compañía de Jesús en Nueva Vizcaya. Esta serie de corpus legislativos regulaba las relaciones entre los distintos actores sociales presentes en esta provincia situada en los confines septentrionales de los territorios americanos de la monarquía hispánica: misioneros, poblaciones autóctonas y otros –militares, hacendados, etc.–. Además de evidenciar la especificidad fronteriza de la región, el interés del estudio de estas normas reside en brindarnos la posibilidad de observar las acomodaciones entre el ideal misionero y la práctica, de entrever el modo en el que se aplicaba la ley y de ahí, en cierto sentido, la vida en la misión y de establecer comparaciones con otros espacios misioneros (Brasil, Paraguay). Finalmente, las ordenanzas invitan a reflexionar sobre el lugar que ocupó la legislación misionera en el proceso de construcción imperial de la monarquía católica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.128

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0080.017
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuee-SpaniaSame topicColonialism, slavery, and tradeFrench-language works237,207