MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007758814 · doi:10.4171/cmh/500

Essential dimension of representations of algebras

2020· preprint· en· W3007758814 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommentarii Mathematici Helvetici · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFunctorMathematicsIsomorphism (crystallography)Type (biology)Bounded functionDimension (graph theory)Invariant (physics)CombinatoricsField (mathematics)Representation (politics)Quadratic growthPure mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let k be a field, A be a finitely generated associative k -algebra and Rep _A[n] be the functor Fields _k\to Sets, which sends a field K containing k to the set of isomorphism classes of representations of A_K of dimension at most n . We study the asymptotic behavior of the essential dimension of this functor, i.e., the function r_A(n) := \mathrm {ed}_k (Rep _A[n]) , as n\to\infty . In particular, we show that the rate of growth of r_A(n) determines the representation type of A . That is, r_A(n) is bounded from above if A is of finite representation type, grows linearly if A is of tame representation type, and grows quadratically if A is of wild representation type. Moreover, r_A(n) allows us to construct invariants of algebras which are finer than the representation type.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it