Achievable Halo Phasing with Short-Range Trajectories
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Short-range halo phasing orbits, which are a type of phasing orbit remaining around the halo orbit, are investigated in the Earth–moon system. The influence of the start and end points on the halo phasing problem is investigated by numerical computation. Under the limitation of the thrust engine, an optimization problem for two-impulse phasing orbits is proposed to achieve the maximum phase change. Numerical computations show that, for the given maximum possible impulsive burn, there exist four types of locally optimal preceding phasing orbits and four types of locally optimal receding phasing orbits. The results of the eight types of optimal phasing orbits are discussed in detail. The “leapfrogging” strategy, composed of several two-impulse phasing arcs, is proposed for phasing missions requiring a large phase difference. Furthermore, halo phasing orbits with continuous thrusts are constructed and investigated. By first using the backstepping method to transform impulsive maneuvers into continuous thrusts and then using the backstepping results as initial guesses, optimal continuous phasing orbits are further constructed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it