MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007957902 · doi:10.1136/sextrans-2019-sti.535

P452 A nurse-led HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis program at cool aid community health centre for men who have sex with men

2019· article· en· W3007957902 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMen who have sex with menMedicineFamily medicinePre-exposure prophylaxisIncidence (geometry)Health careHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Partner notificationSyphilis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Gay, bisexual and MSM continue to comprise the greatest number of new HIV diagnosis in BC (BCCDC, 2016). The complexity of the HIV epidemic among MSM has highlighted the need for broader approaches to HIV prevention. Publicly funded access to PrEP in BC began in 2018. The low barrier MSM STI testing clinic at Cool Aid CHC demonstrates that PrEP can be implemented successfully through a nurse-led program. <h3>Methods</h3> Description of model of care/intervention: This novel CHC based Men’s STI Testing Clinic is staffed by STI certified practice nurses and run in partnership with AIDS Vancouver Island (AVI). It is advertised through MSM social media sites by the AVI Men’s Wellness Coordinator. At the initial visit, clients complete a HIRI-MSM index, a sexual/medical history, required screening and participate in PrEP counseling and education. Physicians review the results and sign the PrEP prescription. Clients without primary care are accepted as patients at the clinic. <h3>Results</h3> Effectiveness: Our innovative non-judgemental, nurse-led model has removed barriers to sexual health screening and enrolled 124 MSM in the PrEP program. Initial PrEP screening showed an STI incidence of 19% and a previous syphilis diagnosis in 15% of those screened. After PrEP initiation STI incidence increased by 7%, highlighting the need for continued safer sex education. There have been no HIV infections amongst PrEP recipients. 20% have discontinued PrEP after approval. 56% of those enrolled felt unable to access PrEP through their physician. 44% of PrEP clients are now linked to primary care at Cool Aid CHC, demonstrating that PrEP can be a tool to prevent HIV transmission in MSM, while engaging patients in primary care and regular STI screening. <h3>Conclusion</h3> and next steps: This innovative program increased access to PrEP for MSM, increased STI testing/treatment, helped to prevent HIV transmission and linked clients to primary care. <h3>Disclosure</h3> No significant relationships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.358
Threshold uncertainty score0.770

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it