MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007957902 · doi:10.1136/sextrans-2019-sti.535

P452 A nurse-led HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis program at cool aid community health centre for men who have sex with men

2019· article· en· W3007957902 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karen Lundgren

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMen who have sex with menMedicineFamily medicinePre-exposure prophylaxisIncidence (geometry)Health careHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Partner notificationSyphilis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Gay, bisexual and MSM continue to comprise the greatest number of new HIV diagnosis in BC (BCCDC, 2016). The complexity of the HIV epidemic among MSM has highlighted the need for broader approaches to HIV prevention. Publicly funded access to PrEP in BC began in 2018. The low barrier MSM STI testing clinic at Cool Aid CHC demonstrates that PrEP can be implemented successfully through a nurse-led program. <h3>Methods</h3> Description of model of care/intervention: This novel CHC based Men’s STI Testing Clinic is staffed by STI certified practice nurses and run in partnership with AIDS Vancouver Island (AVI). It is advertised through MSM social media sites by the AVI Men’s Wellness Coordinator. At the initial visit, clients complete a HIRI-MSM index, a sexual/medical history, required screening and participate in PrEP counseling and education. Physicians review the results and sign the PrEP prescription. Clients without primary care are accepted as patients at the clinic. <h3>Results</h3> Effectiveness: Our innovative non-judgemental, nurse-led model has removed barriers to sexual health screening and enrolled 124 MSM in the PrEP program. Initial PrEP screening showed an STI incidence of 19% and a previous syphilis diagnosis in 15% of those screened. After PrEP initiation STI incidence increased by 7%, highlighting the need for continued safer sex education. There have been no HIV infections amongst PrEP recipients. 20% have discontinued PrEP after approval. 56% of those enrolled felt unable to access PrEP through their physician. 44% of PrEP clients are now linked to primary care at Cool Aid CHC, demonstrating that PrEP can be a tool to prevent HIV transmission in MSM, while engaging patients in primary care and regular STI screening. <h3>Conclusion</h3> and next steps: This innovative program increased access to PrEP for MSM, increased STI testing/treatment, helped to prevent HIV transmission and linked clients to primary care. <h3>Disclosure</h3> No significant relationships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePoster presentationsSame topicHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207