A note on the applicability of the standard nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator for combined incident and prevalent cohort data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nonparametric estimation of the survival function for either incident or prevalent cohort failure time data, exclusively, has been well studied in the literature; the Kaplan‐Meier (KM) estimator is routinely used for right‐censored incident cohort failure time data, whereas a modified form of the KM estimator, sometimes referred to as the Tsai–Jewell–Wang (TJW) estimator, is the default estimator used for prevalent cohort data with follow‐up. Often, failure time data comprise observations from a combination of incident and prevalent cohorts. In this note, we justify the use of the TJW estimator for a combined sample of incident and prevalent cohort data with follow‐up. We suggest how the TJW estimator forms the basis for density estimation and hypothesis testing problems, when incident and prevalent cohorts are combined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it