Quality of Transmission Estimation and Short-Term Performance Forecast of Lightpaths
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With ever-increasing traffic, the need of more dynamic, flexible, and autonomous optical networks is more important than ever. The availability of performance monitoring data makes it possible to leverage machine learning (ML) for fast quality of transmission (QoT) estimation and performance prediction of lightpaths in complex optical networks. In this article, we will explore classifiers based on support vector machine (SVM) and artificial neural network (ANN) for QoT estimation of unestablished lightpaths. Using a synthetic knowledge base (KB), the classification accuracy of the ANN and SVM models decreased from 99%, with a complete feature set, to 85.03% and 88.52%, respectively, with a reduced feature set. We also propose a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), an Encoder-Decoder LSTM and a Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) models, trained with 13-months field performance data, for lightpath signal-to-noise (SNR) prediction over forecast horizons up to four days. Positive R2values combined with low (2and the highest RMSE values (0.296 dB). Additional input data will be needed to improve the prediction accuracy of the LSTM and GRU models trained with single lightpath data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".