MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008742350 · doi:10.1080/13645145.2020.1715637

Theories of disease, sanitary reform and nineteenth- and early twentieth-century tourism to the Oberammergau Passion Play

2019· article· en· W3008742350 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Travel Writing · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ReginaCampion College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassionTourismMythologyHistoryPopulationPlague (disease)IrishAncient historyLiteratureSociologyClassicsArtArchaeologyDemographyPsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

International tourism to the Oberammergau Passion Play grew quickly through the latter half of the nineteenth century. Irish, British, American and Canadian travel writers recorded and published their impressions of the village and its play in increasing numbers through the turn of the century. Most accounts of the Play included its myth of origin, that during an outbreak of plague in 1633, during the Thirty Years’ War, the villagers vowed to perform a dramatisation of Christ’s passion every ten years if God would save them from the illness. As a result, the subject of disease, historical and contemporary, figured importantly in travellers’ accounts of the village and its theatrical production. These accounts reflected contemporary understanding of disease generation/transmission and speculated on the effect increased travel to Oberammergau would have on the population and its Passion Play.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it