MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cascade First and Second Order Sliding Mode Controller of a QuadRotor UAV based on Exponential Reaching Law and Modified Super-Twisting Algorithm

2019· article· en· W3008955170 on OpenAlexaff
Enrique Paiva, Marcos Gomez-Redondo, Jorge Rodas, Yassine Kali, Maarouf Saad, Raúl Gregor, Héctor Fretes

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCascadeControl theory (sociology)Exponential functionTrajectoryPID controllerSliding mode controlController (irrigation)Mode (computer interface)Variable structure controlEngineeringComputer scienceControl engineeringLawNonlinear systemMathematicsControl (management)Artificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unmanned aerial vehicles have become a disruptive technology, which has experienced exponential growth in several applications. The control of these vehicles is a fairly wide area and the cascade PID controller is the most used in practice. However, this latter structure doesn't ensure high performances in the presence of unmodelled dynamics, uncertainties and external abrupt disturbances. To that end, this work proposes a new method that consists of a non-linear cascade configuration of the variable structure control between first order sliding mode based on exponential reaching law and modified super-twisting second order sliding mode algorithm. The developed method is tested on simulation on a quadrotor system, the results obtained demonstrate good performance for trajectory tracking and as well as other non-linear controller options, it is robust against unmodeled dynamics and disturbances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207