Assessment of Tigris River Water Quality in Mosul for Drinking and Domestic Use by Applying CCME Water Quality Index
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current research concentrated on the application of the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Water Quality Index for drinking and domestic use (CCME WQI). Ten sampling sites were hosen along the river reach to collect water samples and faraway from the riverbanks where the flowing stream is considerably high in Mosul City. The fieldwork was done from 2008 to 2014. Ten parameters were selected, namely: pH Value, Calcium, Nitrate, Turbidity, Dissolved Oxygen, Chloride, Total Dissolved Solids, Phosphate, and Sulfate. The results have shown that the water quality of Tigris River was ranged between 93.7-66.3, and that station 1 which was situated in upstream of River was excellent than the other stations. This work confirms the need for serious action, and it must undergo preliminary treatment before use for drinking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it