MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009335319 · doi:10.1080/21504857.2019.1700144

Spirou’s transnational travels: historical memory and comics memory in Flix’s<i>Spirou in Berlin</i>

2020· article· en· W3009335319 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Graphic Novels & Comics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComics and Graphic Narratives
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComicsAdventureGermanEntertainmentHistoryValue (mathematics)LiteratureVisual artsArt historyArtArchaeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While Flix’s Spirou in Berlin can be enjoyed simply for its entertainment value and the novelty of a German-created Spirou story, it is more than just a slapstick spin-off. Flix’s latest Spirou adventure references the intertwined histories of Franco-Belgian and German comics while also reflecting on the mediated memories of divided Germany and the Peaceful Revolution of 1989. Spirou in Berlin thus offers a productive case study for thinking about the many different ways that memory can be conceptualised in comics studies. Referencing not only GDR history, but also comics history, as well as an array of medial representations of the Cold War and divided Berlin, Flix’s comic encourages a medium-specific approach to memory that explores not only how comics act as a medium for the memory of historical events, but as a space to reflect on the memory of the comics medium itself.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.714
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it