MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009354171 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2977325

PredictDeep: Security Analytics as a Service for Anomaly Detection and Prediction

2020· article· en· W3009354171 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware System Performance and Reliability
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsComputer scienceAnomaly detectionAnalyticsComputer securityData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As businesses embrace digitization, the Internet of Everything (IoE) begins to take shape and the Cloud continues to empower new innovations for big data -at the heart, Cloud analytic applications gain increasing momentum. Such applications have remarkable benefits for big data processing, making it easy, fast, scalable, and cost-effective; albeit, they pose many security risks. Security breaches causing anomalous activities due to malicious, vulnerable, or misconfigured analytic applications are considered the top security risks to big “sensitive” data. The risk is further expanded from the coupling of data analytics with the Cloud. Towards maintaining secure and trustworthy applications, effective anomaly detection and prediction become crucial tasks to be offered by Cloud providers. This paper presents, PredictDeep, a novel security analytics framework for anomaly detection and prediction. The proposed framework leverages log data collected from monitoring systems with graph analytics and deep learning techniques to add intelligence for detecting and predicting known and unknown patterns of security anomalies. It represents the collected data and transforms them into a graph model. The graph model captures the analytical activities as well as their interrelation. In this sense, such a model provides informed insight of the monitored application, understanding its behavior, and revealing anomalous patterns. Different from existing traditional rule-based machine learning and statistics-based approaches, our solution takes the benefits of incorporating not only available node attributes but also graph structure and context information to extract rich features that boost the anomaly classification and prediction. We leverage graph embeddings to represent the nodes and relationships in the graph model as feature vectors to learn and predict anomalies in an inductive way utilizing recent advanced deep graph neural network techniques. This design augments our solution with robustness and computational efficiency. Extensive experiments are conducted over an open-source Hadoop log dataset. The evaluation results demonstrate that PredictDeep is a viable solution and very effective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it