MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optimal Integration of Renewable Distributed Generation in Practical Distribution Grids based on Moth-Flame optimization Algorithm

2019· article· en· W3010250576 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2019 International Conference on Advanced Electrical Engineering (ICAEE) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSizingDistributed generationPhotovoltaic systemComputer scienceRenewable energyMathematical optimizationPower (physics)AlgorithmOptimization algorithmStability (learning theory)TurbineAutomotive engineeringEngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed generator (DG) resources are small scale electric power generating plants that can provide power in distribution grids. The above benefits can be achieved by optimal integration of DG using novel optimization algorithm namely Moth-flame optimization (MFO) algorithm for determine the optimal location and sizing to reduce the power losses and augmented voltage stability index. The proposed algorithm is evaluated on IEEE 69-bus, and practical radial distribution grids: Constantine City 73-bus and Indian 85-bus. The installed DGs are photovoltaic (PV) and wind turbine (WT) sources. A numerical simulation including comparative studies was presented to demonstrate the performance and applicability of the MFO algorithm. The validity of the proposed MFO algorithm is demonstrated by comparing the obtained results with those reported in literature using other optimization techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it