MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W301099071

Phase transitions of dominating clique problem and their implications to heuristics in satisfiability search

2005· article· en· W301099071 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicConstraint Satisfaction and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeuristicsClique problemSatisfiabilityMonotone polygonCliqueComputer scienceTime complexityRandom graphLocal search (optimization)MathematicsBoolean satisfiability problemGraphTheoretical computer scienceMathematical optimizationAlgorithmCombinatoricsLine graphPathwidth
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study a monotone NP decision problem, the dominating clique problem, whose phase transition occurs at a very dense stage of the random graph evolution process. We establish the exact threshold of the phase transition and propose an efficient search algorithm that runs in super-polynomial time with high probability. Our empirical studies reveal two even more intriguing phenomena in its typical-case complexity: (1) the problem is uniformly hard with a tiny runtime variance on negative instances. (2) Our algorithm and its CNF-tailored implementation, outperform several SAT solvers by a huge margin on dominating cliques and some other SAT problems with similar structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.537

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it