MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

AIOPS Prediction for Hard Drive Failures Based on Stacking Ensemble Model

2020· article· en· W3011013547 on OpenAlexaff
Haifeng Wang, Haili Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venue2020 10th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Storage Technologies
Canadian institutionsKensington Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceStackingFeature extractionArtificial intelligenceProcess (computing)Ensemble forecastingEnsemble learningData miningMachine learningRaw dataFilter (signal processing)Feature (linguistics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Computer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper mainly shares a successful Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) solution we have built for a cloud storage array to deal with unbalanced hard disk failure data and predict disk failure. Firstly, we preprocessed the unbalanced disk data to filter out irrelevant raw data. Based on SMART (Self-Monitoring, Analysis, and Reporting Technology) attributes, we extracted 14 preliminary attributes as training features for disk failure prediction. Secondly, we used a feature extraction library called Tsfresh and 16 extraction methods to regenerate more than 1500 features. To accelerate machine learning process, we used the Benjamini Yekutieli procedure with a significance test to select the most relevant features. Since a single predictive model no longer performs sufficiently well on the unbalanced dataset, we finally input the prediction results calculated by three algorithms(XGBoost classification, LSTM classification, and XGBoost regression) as new features input of a stacking ensemble learning model that can generate more stable and accurate prediction results. The experimental results showed that the proposed stacking ensemble learning model can accurately predict the disk failure and necessity of disk replacement 0 to 14 days, 14 to 42 days and more days in advance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2020 10th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC)Same topicAdvanced Data Storage TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207