MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3011638652 · doi:10.1002/agj2.20162

Diversifying cropping systems enhances productivity, stability, and nitrogen use efficiency

2020· article· en· W3011638652 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAgronomy Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of LethbridgeAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField peaCanolaAgronomySativumCropping systemBrassicaNitrogenPisumProductivityGrain yieldField experimentMathematicsFertilizerWheat grainBiologyCropChemistryHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Long‐term field experiments are useful for determining cropping system productivity, stability, and resource use efficiency. With 12 yr (2004–2015) of data from five cropping systems on a long‐term experiment (> 30 yr) under semiarid conditions in Saskatchewan, Canada, a systems‐approach was used to compare grain and protein yield, stability, nitrogen (N) dynamics, N fertilizer (FUE G,P ), and available N use efficiency (NUE G,P ) for grain and protein. Annualized grain and protein yields for wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)‐canola ( Brassica napus L.)‐wheat‐field pea ( Pisum sativum L.; W‐C‐W‐P) were 2244 and 372 kg ha −1 , respectively, 14 to 38% and 33 to 66% higher, respectively, than continuous wheat (ContW), summer fallow‐wheat‐wheat‐wheat (F‐W‐W‐W), F‐W‐W, and lentil ( Lens culinaris Medik) green manure‐wheat‐wheat (GM‐W‐W). Fallow systems were the most stable, but less productive and well‐adapted to low‐yielding conditions, while GM‐W‐W was the least stable and poorly adapted. The ContW had below‐average stability and was better suited to high‐yielding conditions for grain. The W‐C‐W‐P consistently produced above‐average yields, and was best suited for high‐yielding conditions for grain and protein. The ContW and W‐C‐W‐P had the highest NUE G (26.4 g kg −1 ) and NUE P (4.1 g kg −1 ), respectively, with GM‐W‐W having the lowest (18.1 and 2.7 g kg −1 ); FUE was the reverse of NUE. This long‐term study showed that diversified cropping systems that include pulses can more consistently produce higher grain and protein yields, regardless of growing conditions, than most other systems with lower N fertilizer inputs, thereby potentially reducing the negative environmental consequences associated with N fertilizer application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.571
Threshold uncertainty score0.809

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it