MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3012135745 · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2020.2978003

Neural-Network-Based Sliding-Mode Control of an Uncertain Robot Using Dynamic Model Approximated Switching Gain

2020· article· en· W3012135745 on OpenAlexaff
Chengxiang Liu, Guiling Wen, Zhijia Zhao, Ramin Sedaghati

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Artificial neural networkSliding mode controlScheme (mathematics)Computer scienceTrajectoryRobotLyapunov functionControl (management)Mode (computer interface)Control engineeringEngineeringMathematicsNonlinear systemArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, a new neural-network-based sliding-mode control (SMC) of an uncertain robot is presented. The distinguishing characteristic of the proposed control scheme is that the switching gain is designed as a dynamic model approximated value, which is handled by using the neural-network strategy to adapt the unknown dynamics and disturbances. In the presented control scheme, the modeling information of the robotic system is not required and only one parameter is required to be estimated in each joint of the robotic system. Subsequently, the Lyapunov method is utilized to prove that the trajectory tracking errors will eventually converge to a neighborhood of zero. Finally, the contrast simulation studies reveal that with the proposed control scheme, the problems of chattering and high-speed switching of control input, which takes place in a conventional SMC, can be addressed, and a satisfactory control precision is guaranteed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations135
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CyberneticsSame topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207