MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deep Learning for an Anti-Jamming CPM Receiver

2019· article· en· W3012137893 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Signal Modulation Classification
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre CanadaGovernment of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJammingComputer scienceWaveformBoosting (machine learning)Synchronization (alternating current)Bit error rateTone (literature)Frequency-hopping spread spectrumContinuous phase modulationElectronic engineeringAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsEngineeringChannel (broadcasting)Decoding methodsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel continuous phase modulation (CPM) receiver model is proposed in this paper that employs deep learning (DL) techniques to improve the signal recovery and synchronization performance under heavy jamming conditions for frequency hopping (FH) based waveforms. A hybrid deep neural network is used to implement the DL in the receiver model. The simulation results show that the proposed receiver with DL boosting is robust under tone jamming which is a worst case scenario for a CPM receiver. The model achieves 3 - 5dB improvement under single-tone jamming, in terms of bit-error-rate (BER), and 2dB improvement under multi-tone jamming, compared with a receiver without DL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.275

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it