MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3012279205 · doi:10.1109/mis.2019.2956692

Special Issue on Situation Awareness in Intelligent Human-Computer Interaction for Time Critical Decision Making

2020· article· en· W3012279205 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Intelligent Systems · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of British ColumbiaQueen's University
KeywordsComputer scienceIntelligent decision support systemHuman–computer interactionSituation awarenessArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The articles in this special section focus on situation awareness in intelligent human-computer interaction for critical decision making (HCI). HCI is recognized as an ctive field that focuses on the various interactions of human with machines. The HCI has been widely applied in multiple domains, such as artificial intelligence, computer vision, image and multimedia analysis, and cognitive and behavioral sciences. The objective of the HCI is to make the computer smart via receiving enough knowledge about the environment where it is deployed and reduce the human intervention aspect toward decision making. This enables development of high-end computers that are context aware and smart in making decisions with reference to the context. Situation awareness of an intelligent HCI will decide the success and application of the solution across the real world environment. The aim of this special issue is to provide a platform on the topic of situation awareness in intelligent HCI for time critical decision making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it