Combining the richness of GIS techniques with visualisation tools to better understand the spatial distribution of data - a case study of Chicago City crime analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to: 1) to explore the benefits of adding a spatial GIS layer of analysis to other existing visualisation techniques; 2) to identify and evaluate the patterns in selected crime data by analysing Chicago's open dataset; 3) provide a better understanding of patterns and prediction of crime trends within the selected geographical location. We conclude that Chicago seems to be on course to have both the lowest violent crime rate since 1972, and the lowest murder frequency since 1967. Chicago has witnessed a vigorous drop in most crimes types over the last few years in compares to the previous crime index data. Also, Chicago crime naturally upsurges during summer months and declines during winter months. Our study results align with previous several decades of studies and analysis of Chicago crimes, in which the same communities of highest crime rates still experience the mainstream of crime.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it