Joint Sparse Concentric Array Design for Frequency and Rotationally Invariant Beampattern
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Frequency-invariant concentric arrays are fundamental components in some real-world applications, like teleconferencing, voice service devices, underwater acoustics, and others, where the azimuthal arrival direction of the desired signal is varying. The fact that the demand for limited hardware and computational resources in such applications is essential, motivates the use of a sparse design which can optimize both the number of the required sensors and the complex weights of the beamformer. Herein, we propose a new greedy based joint-sparse design of frequency and rotationally invariant concentric arrays which preserves the properties of the designed directivity pattern for different azimuthal directions of steering. Simulation results show that the greedy sparse design, compared to uniform and random designs, gives superior performance in terms of array gain, and frequency and rotationally invariant beampattern, with a reasonable computational and hardware resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it