libSmart: an Open-Source Tool for Simple Integration of Deep Learning into Intelligent Robotic Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intelligent robotic systems can be empowered by advanced deep learning techniques. Robotic operations such as object recognition are well investigated by researchers involved in machine learning. However, these solutions have often led to ad-hoc implementation in experimental settings. Less reported is systematic implementation of deep learning models in industrial robots. The lack of standard implementation platforms has impeded widespread use of deep learning modules in industrial robots. It is of great importance to have development platforms that can coordinate several deep learning modules of a complex system. In this paper, a scalable deep-learning friendly robot task organization system named libSmart is introduced. Similar to ROS, the architecture of the proposed system allows users to plug and play various devices but the proposed architecture is also highly compatible with deep learning modules. Specifically, the deployment of deep learning models is handled using a novel data graph method with distributed computing. In this way, the computationally expensive training and inferencing processes of deep learning models can be handled with isolated accelerating hardware to reduce the overall system latency. Successful implementation of simultaneous object recognition and pose estimation by an industrial robot has been presented as a case study. The proposed system is open source for all users to build their own intelligent systems with customized deep-learning models. (https://github.com/RustIron/libSmart.git).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it