MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deep Adaptive Transmission for Internet of Vehicles (IoV)

2020· article· en· W3013355220 on OpenAlexaff
Mehrtash Mehrabi, Mostafa Mohammadkarimi, Masoud Ardakani, Yindi Jing

Bibliographic record

Venue2020 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Signal Modulation Classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmitterComputer scienceTransmission (telecommunications)FadingChannel (broadcasting)Link adaptationA priori and a posterioriBit error rateData transmissionComputer networkReal-time computingElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To support reliable transmission of data at high rate in time-varying fading channels, adaptive transmission is required, where transmitter and receiver adjust their transmission and reception mode to the dynamics of the channel. The receiver, based on its channel estimation and prediction, decides the optimal link adaptation and feeds this back to the transmitter. In this paper, we develop a deep learning (DL)-based link adaptation algorithm for highly dynamic communication links, where adaptive transmission parameters are decided for l > 1 forward time steps without a priori knowledge on channel statistics. Compared to conventional solutions, our approach reduces the feedback requirements from the receiver to the transmitter by a factor of l which significantly reduces the complexity. This achievement comes at no additional cost on the data rate and/or bit error rate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2020 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC)Same topicWireless Signal Modulation ClassificationFrench-language works237,207