MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Decentralized Bandwidth Allocation Framework for Energy-Efficiency and Fog Integration in PONs

2020· article· en· W3013486398 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2020 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEfficient energy usePassive optical networkEnergy consumptionBandwidth (computing)Energy conservationEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionComputer networkEdge deviceTransceiverCarbon footprintDistributed computingTelecommunicationsCloud computingWavelength-division multiplexingEngineeringWirelessElectrical engineeringGreenhouse gas

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the continuous growth of telecommunication networks, improving their energy efficiency to reduce the carbon footprint has become one of the most important research topics of today. In this paper, we focus on power conservation in passive optical networks (PONs), for which many centralized-based algorithms have been proposed in the literature. For the first time, we propose a novel energy-efficient framework that is decentralized-based. The proposed decentralized framework is designed to meet the requirements of next-generation access networks by addressing three main challenges; achieving high network performance, conserving energy, and supporting edge-to-edge communications for fog and edge computing. Numerical results show that, even though additional transceivers are used, the proposed framework achieves better network performance with lower energy consumption than its centralized counterpart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.923

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it