Tolerating memory latency through software-controlled pre-execution in simultaneous multithreading processors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hardly predictable data addresses in many irregular applications have rendered prefetching ineffective. In many cases, the only accurate way to predict these addresses is to directly execute the code that generates them. As multithreaded architectures become increasingly popular, one attractive approach is to use idle threads on these machines to perform pre-execution— essentially a combined act of speculative address generation and prefetching—to accelerate the main thread. In this paper, we propose such a pre-execution technique for simultaneous multithreading (SMT) processors. By using software to control pre-execution, we are able to handle some of the most important access patterns that are typically difficult to prefetch. Compared with existing work on pre-execution, our technique is significantly simpler to implement (e.g., no integration of pre-execution results, no need of shortening programs for pre-execution, and no need of special hardware to copy register values upon thread spawns). Consequently, only minimal extensions to SMT machines are required to support our technique. Despite its simplicity, our technique offers an average speedup of 24% in a set of irregular applications, which is a 19% speedup over state-of-the-art software-controlled prefetching.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it