Exploring anomalous behaviour detection and classification for insider threat identification
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Recently, malicious insider threats represent one of the most damaging threats to companies and government agencies. Insider threat detection is a highly skewed data analysis problem, where the huge class imbalance makes the adaptation of learning algorithms to the real‐world context very difficult. This study proposes a new system for user‐centred machine learning‐based anomaly behaviour and insider threat detection on multiple data granularity levels. System evaluations and analysis are performed not only on individual data instances but also on normal and malicious users. Our results show that the proposed system, which is a combination of unsupervised anomaly detection and supervised machine learning methods, can learn from unlabelled data and a very small amount of labelled data. Furthermore, it can generalize to bigger datasets for detecting anomalous behaviours and unseen malicious insiders with a high detection and a low false‐positive rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it