Achieving Accountable and Efficient Data Sharing in Industrial Internet of Things
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, we propose an accountable and efficient data sharing scheme for industrial IoT (IIoT), named an accountable and data sharing scheme (ADS), in which a data owner can pursue the responsibility of a data receiver if the latter leaks some sensitive shared data to the public for profits while without permission (i.e., accountability). Specifically, ADS is built upon an adaptive decentralized oblivious transfer protocol together with a zero-knowledge proof technique, which enables the data receiver's private key to be hidden from the data owner and yet correctly embedded into the shared data during the process of data sharing. Once data breaches occur, the private key can be automatically revealed to the data owner so as to achieve the accountability. In addition, with ADS, a group of sharing providers can also assist IIoT devices in handling heavy computational tasks via the secret sharing technique without sacrificing the security. Extensive performance evaluations are conducted, and the simulation results demonstrate that ADS has high computational efficiency, making it well fit for IIoT.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it