MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014297757 · doi:10.1109/tmc.2020.2984261

LeaD: Large-Scale Edge Cache Deployment Based on Spatio-Temporal WiFi Traffic Statistics

2020· article· en· W3014297757 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaHigher Education Discipline Innovation ProjectNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceCacheComputer networkSoftware deploymentBackhaul (telecommunications)BottleneckEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionTelecommunicationsOperating systemEmbedded systemBase station

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Widespread and large-scale WiFi systems have been deployed in many corporate locations, while the backhual capacity becomes the bottleneck in providing high-rate data services to a tremendous number of WiFi users. Mobile edge caching is a promising solution to relieve backhaul pressure and deliver quality services by proactively pushing contents to access points (APs). However, how to deploy cache in large-scale WiFi system is not well studied yet quite challenging since numerous APs can have heterogeneous traffic characteristics, and future traffic conditions are unknown ahead. In this paper, given the cache storage budget, we explore the cache deployment in a large-scale WiFi system, which contains 8,000 APs and serves more than 40,000 active users, to maximize the long-term caching gain. Specifically, we first collect two-month user association records and conduct intensive spatio-temporal analytics on WiFi traffic consumption, gaining two major observations. First, per AP traffic consumption varies in a rather wide range and the proportion of AP distributes evenly within the range, indicating that the cache size should be heterogeneously allocated in accordance to the underlying traffic demands. Second, compared to a single AP, the traffic consumption of a group of APs (clustered by physical locations) is more stable, which means that the short-term traffic statistics can be used to infer the future long-term traffic conditions. We then propose our cache deployment strategy, named LeaD (i.e., Large-scale WiFi Edge cAche Deployment), in which we first cluster large-scale APs into well-sized edge nodes, then conduct the stationary testing on edge level traffic consumption and sample sufficient traffic statistics in order to precisely characterize long-term traffic conditions, and finally devise the TEG (Traffic-wEighted Greedy) algorithm to solve the long-term caching gain maximization problem. Extensive trace-driven experiments are carried out, and the results demonstrate that LeaD is able to achieve the near-optimal caching performance and can outperform other benchmark strategies significantly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it