Detecting Pulse Wave From Unstable Facial Videos Recorded From Consumer-Level Cameras: A Disturbance-Adaptive Orthogonal Matching Pursuit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Modern consumer-level cameras can detect subtle changes in human facial skin color due to varying blood flow; they are beginning to be used as noncontact devices to detect pulse waves. Little, however, do we know about their capacity to perform pulse wave detection when the recorded faces are unstable. METHODS: Here, we propose a novel method that can extract pulse waves from videos with drastic facial unsteadiness such as head twists and alternating expressions. The method first uses chrominance characteristics in multiple facial sub-regions to construct a raw pulse matrix. Subsequently, it employs a disturbance-adaptive orthogonal matching pursuit (DAOMP) algorithm to recover the underlying pulse matrix corrupted by facial unsteadiness. RESULTS: To evaluate the efficacy of the method, we perform analyses on two datasets including 268 samples from 67 testing subjects. The results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms, especially in the terrain where drastic facial unsteadiness is present. CONCLUSION: The proposed framework shows promise to achieve videos-based noncontact pulse wave detection from both steady and unsteady faces recorded by consumer-level cameras. SIGNIFICANCE: By employing the proposed method, disturbance robustness in noncontact pulse wave detection can be significantly improved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".