MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Real-Time Autonomous Obstacle Avoidance for Fixed-Wing UAVs Using a Dynamic Model

2020· article· en· W3014780816 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Aerospace Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObstacle avoidanceTrajectoryKinematicsSolverControl theory (sociology)Model predictive controlComputer scienceFidelityObstacleCollision avoidanceNonlinear systemKey (lock)Fixed wingControl engineeringWingEngineeringAerospace engineeringMobile robotArtificial intelligenceCollisionControl (management)Robot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an approach for real-time autonomous obstacle avoidance for fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for scenarios in which a UAV is required to stay close to a reference path. A key challenge is rapid trajectory generation around obstacles while accommodating vehicle constraints. A UAV model with nonlinear dynamic constraints provides more natural accommodation of the vehicle’s constraints than a kinematic model with linear constraints. This paper presents a method for using finite horizon model predictive control with a custom solver that offers low solution time. A comparative study of a high-fidelity model and a lower-fidelity counterpart is presented. Using the proposed method, the high-fidelity model provides better trajectories than the lower-fidelity counterpart, despite both having low computational requirement for onboard trajectory generation in an embedded platform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.858

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it