MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014927864 · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2020.2983607

Impact of Synaptic Strength on Propagation of Asynchronous Spikes in Biologically Realistic Feed-Forward Neural Network

2020· article· en· W3014927864 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of TorontoKrembil Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAsynchronous communicationArtificial neural networkBackpropagationArtificial intelligenceComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the problem of reliable information propagation in the brain using biologically realistic models of spiking neurons. Biological neurons use action potentials, or spikes, to encode information. Information can be encoded by the rate of asynchronous spikes or by the (precise) timing of synchronous spikes. Reliable propagation of synchronous spikes is well understood in neuroscience and is relatively easy to implement by biologically-realistic models of neurons. However, reliable propagation of rate-modulated asynchronous spikes is poorly understood and remains difficult to implement by those models. In this paper, we formulate how a multi-layered feedforward neural network (mlFNN) comprising biologically-plausible model neurons enables propagation of time-varying asynchronous spikes. Gradient descent algorithm is developed to estimate the connectivity between neurons (i.e., synaptic weights) in mlFNN. Furthermore, we propose an abstract network model to replicate information propagation in mlFNN with substantially less complexity in estimating synaptic weights. The abstract model has a great implication for neuromorphic computing, as it can be implemented in neuromorphic circuits with less complexity, less energy, and more speed. Simulation results demonstrate that (i) the mlFNN with optimal synapses transmits asynchronous spikes reliably, and (ii) the abstract network model reproduces information propagation performed by mlFNN with high accuracy (coding fraction = 0.97 ± 0.02). We anticipate that this study will facilitate the design and implementation of biologically realistic mlFNN in neuromorphic circuits as well as cross-fertilizations between the fields of neuromorphic engineering, computational neuroscience and artificial intelligence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it