MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015132689 · doi:10.4171/jems/1245

Interpolation and duality in algebras of multipliers on the ball

2022· article· en· W3015132689 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the European Mathematical Society · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Topics in Algebra
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsDuality (order theory)Ball (mathematics)Interpolation (computer graphics)Algebra over a fieldApplied mathematicsPure mathematicsMathematical analysisArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the multiplier algebras A(\mathcal{H}) obtained as the closure of the polynomials on certain reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces \mathcal{H} on the ball \mathbb{B}_d of \mathbb{C}^d . Our results apply, in particular, to the Drury–Arveson space, the Dirichlet space and the Hardy space on the ball. We first obtain a complete description of the dual and second dual spaces of A(\mathcal H) in terms of the complementary bands of Henkin and totally singular measures for \operatorname{Mult}(\mathcal{H}) . This is applied to obtain several definitive results in interpolation. In particular, we establish a sharp peak interpolation result for compact \operatorname{Mult}(\mathcal{H}) -totally null sets as well as a Pick and peak interpolation theorem. Conversely, we show that a mere interpolation set is \operatorname{Mult}(\mathcal{H}) -totally null.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it