MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015726929 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2986972

Current Status and Future Trends of GaN HEMTs in Electrified Transportation

2020· article· en· W3015726929 on OpenAlexafffund
Niloufar Keshmiri, Deqiang Wang, Bharat Agrawal, Ruoyu Hou, Ali Emadi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaMcMaster University
KeywordsCurrent (fluid)Gallium nitrideEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceEngineering physicsOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringPhysicsNanotechnologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gallium Nitride High Electron Mobility Transistors (GaN HEMTs) enable higher efficiency, higher power density, and smaller passive components resulting in lighter, smaller and more efficient electrical systems as opposed to conventional Silicon (Si) based devices. This paper investigates the detailed benefits of using GaN devices in transportation electrification applications. The material properties of GaN including the applications of GaN HEMTs at different switch ratings are presented. The challenges currently facing the transportation industry are introduced and possible solutions are presented. A detailed review of the use of GaN in the Electric Vehicle (EV) powertrain is discussed. The implementation of GaN devices in aircraft, ships, rail vehicles and heavy-duty vehicles is briefly covered. Future trends of GaN devices in terms of cost, voltage level, gate driver design, thermal management and packaging are investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations209
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207