MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3016369572 · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2020.2987543

A Tensor Based Framework for Multi-Domain Communication Systems

2020· article· en· W3016369572 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicTensor decomposition and applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceTensor (intrinsic definition)Theoretical computer scienceDistributed computingTopology (electrical circuits)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The demand for mobile data is likely to grow at a pace more than envisaged in the coming years. Further, as applications such as the Internet of Things (IoT) come to fruition, there will be increased diversity in the types of devices demanding Internet connectivity and their requirements. Significant increase in data rate requirements is also expected due to services such as Ultra High Definition (UHD) video streaming and cloud computing. To meet all these demands, physical layer waveform candidates for future generations of communications need to be robust and inherently capable of extending into multiple domains (space, time, frequency, users, transmission media, code etc.) to ensure efficient utilization of resources. Multiple domains can be innately integrated into the design process of modulation schemes by using tensors, which are multi-way arrays. This paper introduces a unified tensor framework, providing a foundation for multi-domain communication systems that can be used to represent, design and analyse schemes that span several domains. Transmitted signals are represented by N$ th order time function tensors which are coupled, using a system tensor of order N+M, with the received signals which are represented by another tensor of order M through the contracted convolution. We begin with the continuous time representation of the tensor system model and present both the strict multi-domain generalization of the Nyquist criterion for zero interference (inter-tensor and intra-tensor interference) as well as a relaxation. We present an equivalent discrete time system model, and as an example of using the tensor framework we derive tensor based linear equalization methods to combat multi-domain interference. An application to multi-user MIMO-GFDM illustrates the utility of this novel framework for derivation of joint domain signal processing techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score0.961

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0050.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.301
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.133 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it