MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3017041809 · doi:10.1353/ecs.2020.0044

The Daily Jane Austen: A Year of Quotes by Devoney Looser, and: Jane Austen's Transatlantic Sister: The Life and Letters of Fanny Palmer Austen by Sheila Johnson Kindred

2020· article· en· W3017041809 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Misty Krueger

Bibliographic record

VenueEighteenth-Century Studies · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiterature Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSisterQueen (butterfly)Art historyPrideArtHistoryLiteratureSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Daily Jane Austen: A Year of Quotes by Devoney Looser, and: Jane Austen's Transatlantic Sister: The Life and Letters of Fanny Palmer Austen by Sheila Johnson Kindred Misty Krueger Devoney Looser, The Daily Jane Austen: A Year of Quotes (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 2019). Pp. 200. $14.00 paperback. Sheila Johnson Kindred, Jane Austen's Transatlantic Sister: The Life and Letters of Fanny Palmer Austen (Montreal: McGill-Queen's Univ. Press, 2017). Pp. 291; 24 color illus., 10 b/w illus., 1 map. $34.95 CAD cloth. Jane Austen is one of the most quoted and misquoted authors to write in the English language. She has a seat at the (mis)quotation table alongside literary giants such as Charles Dickens and Henry Melville, as Devoney Looser reminds us in her foreword to The Daily Jane Austen: A Year of Quotes. How many people have quoted the famed beginning from Pride and Prejudice to fit their needs? Many, including Looser, who begins her foreword by encouraging readers to think about the act of quoting Austen: "It is a truth universally acknowledged that you could put almost anything in the second half of this sentence" (v). Fittingly, the book's daybook-like offering of daily Austen quotations also begins with this opening from the beloved novel. Each new month of the book is prefaced by a longer passage from one of Austen's novels—most coming from Pride and Prejudice or Persuasion—and then, for each day of the month, Looser provides a short excerpt from Austen's novels, juvenilia, and letters. Some of these entries quote brief dialogue from these works; some, just a witty line or two; and some, a paragraph or more. The book ends with a handy index for readers who want to search for their favorite novels or compare the quotations provided from particular works. The Daily Jane Austen enters a longstanding tradition of daily literary quotation books, but Looser's thoughtful foreword reminds us that there is more to the art of editing such a volume than randomly choosing great lines from great works. The editor of such a collection must think about what happens when we take quotations out of context and how readers understand Austen's language as stand-alone witticisms when there is literally and figuratively much more to the story. The editor must keep in mind, as the Austen reader should, that there are [End Page 491] many ways to read an Austen passage. Looser is correct, then, to remind us that even when we think we know what Austen means in any perhaps-familiar paragraph, her lines "deserve greater scrutiny" (vii). As Looser points out, quoting Austen is "a surprisingly fraught exercise" because every line should be read contextually to determine if the writer's "prose is laudable, laughable, or lamentable" (x). Sometimes Austen is making a joke. Sometimes she intends for the reader to question the characters she mocks, such as Caroline Bingley or Mrs. Elton when they insincerely speak words that sound good. As Looser notes, Austen citation is problematic in this way even for the Bank of England, which, on its latest ten-pound note, quotes Caroline on the act of reading and misses the remark's ironic context. Quoting the narrator or one of Austen's protagonists is not the same as quoting an antagonist. A pleasure perhaps indirectly offered by The Daily Austen is the opportunity it provides to think again about the notorious misquotation of Austen's works, without proper consideration of the original context—and the equally rampant misattribution of witticisms to her, as in the frequent instances when lines spoken in contemporary films are credited to her. Before reading all of the wonderful quotations shared in Looser's book, the reader is poised to learn a great deal from the foreword. It is a gem both for its guidance in thinking about the act of Austen quotation and for its contextualization of quotation as an eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century practice. We know that Austen read books of extracts, such as Vicesimus Knox's 1780s Elegant Extracts, and that she liked to quote from authors in her letters...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1430.100

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEighteenth-Century StudiesSame topicLiterature Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207