MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3017499967 · doi:10.4236/apm.2020.104012

The Extension of Cauchy Integral Formula to the Boundaries of Fundamental Domains

2020· article· en· W3017499967 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Pure Mathematics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic and Geometric Analysis
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsCauchy's integral formulaMethods of contour integrationCauchy distributionDomain (mathematical analysis)Bounded functionMathematical analysisExtension (predicate logic)Boundary (topology)Simply connected spaceJordan curve theoremFunction (biology)Pure mathematicsCauchy principal valueSingular integralLimit (mathematics)Cauchy's integral theoremCauchy problemInitial value problemIntegral equationCauchy boundary conditionNeumann boundary condition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cauchy integral formula expresses the value of a function f(z), which is analytic in a simply connected domain D, at any point z0 interior to a simple closed contour C situated in D in terms of the values of on C. We deal in this paper with the question whether C can be the boundary ∂Ω of a fundamental domain Ω of f(z). At the first look the answer appears to be negative since ∂Ω contains singular points of the function and it can be unbounded. However, the extension of Cauchy integral formula to some of these unbounded curves, respectively arcs ending in singular points of f(z) is possible due to the fact that they can be obtained at the limit as r → ∞ of some bounded curves contained in the pre-image of the circle |z| = r and of some circles |z-a| = 1/r for which the formula is valid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it