MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W301954106

Banking's Top Performer 2007: Another Stellar Year, but Will 2006 Be the End of a Good Run?

2007· article· en· W301954106 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vanessa Mambrino, Nancy Michael

Bibliographic record

VenueABA banking journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBanking stability, regulation, efficiency
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReal estateDivestmentBusinessInterest rateQuarter (Canadian coin)Net interest incomeFinancial systemFinanceEconomicsGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A gauntlet was thrown down last year, and banks and thrifts rose to the challenge. The yield curve became inverted in the first quarter of 2006. Long-term rates recovered during the beginning of the second quarter, but by June short-term rates had risen above them again. Although the two rates remained close during the second half of the year, the curve continued to be slightly inverted, causing margin compression at most banks. This compression was exacerbated by the continuation of trends that appeared in 2005: the cooling of the residential real estate lending market and the movement of deposits into accounts with ever-higher rates. Despite that challenging environment, banks and thrifts finished another year of record earnings performance in 2006. To counter the adverse factors, some institutions, including this year's top performers, shifted lending activities away from one-to-four family and multifamily mortgage lending and toward commercial and industrial lending to recover interest income. At the beginning of the year, institutions were buying mortgage lenders (Wachovia's purchase of Golden West Financial), but by the end of the year they were selling them (National City's divestiture of First Franklin Financial). In addition, many companies began to either cut costs or cut their losses on unprofitable lines of business, narrowing their focus to core business lines or niche markets in which they believed they had a competitive advantage. These tactics prompted two mergers-of-equals in 2006, between Regions Financial and AmSouth and between Bank of New York and Mellon Financial. Others simply shifted geographic focus to high-growth markets. In general, increased consolidation among banks and thrifts was a strong trend in 2006: a total of 287 deals were completed by year-end, relative to 267 in 2005. In Part One of the 15th annual ABA Banking Journal performance rankings, we review the financial results and strategies of the nation's largest banks and thrifts. Next month we'll highlight the top-performing community banks and thrifts. Selection criteria Our study ranks the performance of domestic institutions with assets over $3 billion as of Dec. 31, 2006. Two groups were included in our analysis: publicly held depository institutions (banks, thrifts, and bank or financial holding companies) and private depositories. A total of 153 public banks, thrifts, and holding companies and 51 private institutions qualified under our selection criteria. They were ranked by return on average equity for 2006. In instances where the reported ROAE was identical for two or more institutions, 2006 return on average assets was used as a secondary ranking criterion. (Three banks met our selection criteria but were not included in our analysis because their data were not available at the time this article was sent to print. Those banks were: Doral Financial Corp. of San Juan, P.R.; RG and Fremont General Corp. of Santa Monica, Calif.) Data were provided by SNL Financial as of December 2006. Securities and Exchange Commission filings were used as the source for public company data, and regulatory filings were the source used for private institutions. Movement among the top ten The top performer, Bank of New York Company of New York City, significantly improved its standing from a rank of 43rd in 2006, aided by a gain from the sale of its retail and middle market banking businesses to JPMorgan Chase in October 2006. As part of that deal, Bank of New York purchased JPMorgan Chase's Corporate Trust business. In December 2006, the company announced that it will merge with Mellon Financial Corp. of Pittsburgh. The second-place institution, PNC Financial Services Group of Pittsburgh, also experienced a large improvement relative to last year's rankings. PNC's 2006 net income benefited from a one-time gain of $1. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0130.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueABA banking journalSame topicBanking stability, regulation, efficiencyFrench-language works237,207