MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3020845358 · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2020.04.017

Experimental study on growth characteristics of pore-scale methane hydrate

2020· article· en· W3020845358 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Reports · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleationHydrateClathrate hydrateMethaneDissolutionPorous mediumCrystallizationChemical engineeringPorosityMaterials scienceChemical physicsChemistryMineralogyPhysical chemistryComposite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to study the behavioral characteristics of the pore-scale hydrate formation, this experiment employs a high-pressure-resistant visible model in an etched glass plate to study the pore-scale methane hydrate formation and reveal its growth law s in porous media. The experiment shows that the evolution of natural gas hydrates is divided into three periods, namely, the instability period of gas–liquid dissolution, the hydrate growth period, and the hydrate formation period. The hydrate growth process accelerates when pressure increases. The increase in temperature yields a random trend. The hydrate growth period has three substages: the gas–liquid cluster and nucleation stage, the gas–liquid film formation and accretion stage, and the deposition and crystallization stage. The hydrate growth laws are drawn as follow: (1) The nucleation characteristics of the gas hydrate directly determine the hydrate’s spatial distribution in the pores. The heterogeneous nucleation is more likely to occur. (2) The spatiotemporal growth of the hydrates is an interaction of two kinds of transformations in the porous media, namely, the transformation from the disordered to the ordered, and the transformation from the hydrophobic to the hydrophilic. In the early stage, the gas–liquid contact appears to be hydrophobic, and the gas–liquid dissolution process shows a repeated disorder. In the later stage, the hydrate begins to be ”hydrophilic”, which means it follows the existing hydrate interface to grow orderly into the depth of the pores. (3) The geometric distribution of the pore structure can change the spatial structure of the water molecules’ growth, which leads the hydrate to distribute with a geometric anisotropy. The research results are aimed to provide a theoretical basis for the exploitation and optimization of marine natural gas hydrates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it