A Framework for Satisfying the Performance Requirements of Containerized Software Systems Through Multi-Versioning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the increasing popularity and complexity of containerized software systems, satisfying the performance requirements of these systems becomes more challenging as well. While a common remedy to this problem is to increase the allocated amount of resources by scaling up or out, this remedy is not necessarily cost-effective and, therefore, often problematic for smaller companies. In this paper, we study an alternative, more cost-effective approach for satisfying the performance requirements of containerized software systems. In particular, we investigate how we can satisfy such requirements by applying software multi-versioning to the system's resource-heavy containers. We present DockerMV, an open-source extension of the Docker framework, to support the multi-versioning of containerized software systems. We demonstrate the efficacy of multi-versioning for satisfying the performance requirements of containerized software systems through experiments on the TeaStore, a microservice reference test application, and Znn, a containerized news portal application. Our DockerMV extension can be used by software developers to introduce multi-versioning in their own containerized software systems, thereby better allowing them to meet the performance requirements of their systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".