MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3021818336 · doi:10.46254/j.ieom.20190202

An Approach to Obsolescence Forecasting based on Hidden Markov Model and Compound Poisson Process

2019· article· en· W3021818336 on OpenAlexaff
Yosra Grichi, Yvan Beauregard, Thiên-My Dao

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operations Management · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTransportation Systems and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObsolescenceMarkov chainComputer scienceReliability engineeringMarkov processEconometricsOperations researchIndustrial engineeringEngineeringStatisticsMathematicsMachine learningBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The popularity of electronic devices has sparked research to implement components that can achieve better performance and scalability. However, companies face significant challenges when they use systems with a long-life cycle, such as in avionics, which leads to obsolescence problems. Obsolescence can be driven by many factors, primary among which could be the rapid development of technologies that lead to a short life cycle of parts. Moreover, obsolescence problems can prove costly in terms of intermittent stock availability and unmet demand. Therefore, obsolescence forecasting appears to be one of the most efficient solutions. This paper presents a review of gaps in the actual approaches and proposes a method that can better forecast the product life cycle. The proposed approach will help companies to improve obsolescence forecasting and reduce its impact in the supply chain. The method introduces a stochastic approach to estimate the obsolescence life cycle through simulation of demand data using Markov chain and homogeneous compound Poisson process. This approach uses multiple states of the life cycle curve based on the change in demand rate and introduces hidden Markov theory to estimate the model parameters. Numerical results are provided to validate the proposed method. To examine the accuracy of this approach, the standard deviation (STD) of obsolescence time is calculated. The results showed that the life cycle curves of parts can be predicted with high accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operations ManagementSame topicTransportation Systems and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207