MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3021987857 · doi:10.1080/23799927.2020.1764626

The <i>g</i> -extra diagnosability of the generalized exchanged hypercube

2020· article· en· W3021987857 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computer Mathematics Computer Systems Theory · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypercubeVertex (graph theory)MathematicsCombinatoricsGraphProperty (philosophy)Set (abstract data type)InterconnectionProcess (computing)Discrete mathematicsComputer scienceTopology (electrical circuits)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diagnosability of a self-diagnosable interconnection structure specifies the maximum number of faulty vertices such a structure can identify by itself. A variety of diagnosability models have been suggested. It turns out that a diagnosability property of a network structure is closely associated with its relevant connectivity property. Based on this observation, a general diagnosability derivation process has been suggested. The g-extra connectivity of a graph G characterizes the size of a minimum vertex set F such that, when it is removed, every component in the disconnected survival graph, G−F, contains at least g + 1 vertices. In this paper, we discuss the aforementioned general derivation process, derive the g-extra connectivity, and then apply the aforementioned general process to reveal the g-extra diagnosability of the generalized exchanged hypercube.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score0.892

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it