Continuous tension reduction to prevent keloid recurrence after surgical excision: Preliminary experience in Asian patients
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Surgical excision combined with postoperative radiotherapy is considered one of the most radical but most effective keloid therapeutic option. However, radiotherapy may not be appropriate for all keloid patients. In this study, we propose an alternate approach to prevent keloid recurrence and provide preliminary assessment in clinical efficacy of this treatment for keloids. Forty consecutive patients with different keloid sites underwent excision without postoperative radiation. After surgery, the tension offloading device was used at least 6 months for the purpose of continuous tension reduction at surgery incision. Scars were assessed independently using scar scale at before and 24-month follow-up. Overall, 38 patients completed this research. Clinical results showed that 35 patients achieved healing with an esthetic appearance at 24-month follow-up. Three patients showed relapse and the recurrence rate was 7.9%. Both of VSS (Vancouver Scar Scale) and JSW (Japan Scar Workshop Scar Scale) scores decreased significantly at 24-month follow-up visit than before. No severe complications were reported. Using the tension offloading device could greatly decrease tension on the surgical incision. The technique of continuous tension reduction could be used as an alternative method to prevent keloid recurrence under the condition of without radiotherapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it