MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3023743114 · doi:10.1088/2515-7647/ab8f89

Coulomb blocking of sequential tunnel ionization in complex systems

2020· article· en· W3023743114 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Photonics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIonizationTunnel ionizationQuantum tunnellingAtomic physicsElectronCoulombCoulomb blockadeCharge (physics)Block (permutation group theory)PhysicsBlocking (statistics)ChemistryIonCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanicsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract When atoms and molecules are exposed to intense low frequency laser fields, the dominant response is sequential tunnel ionization of charge states with increasing ionization potential. Sequential ionization is assumed to proceed as separate one electron processes. The theoretical analysis developed here reveals that in complex systems sequential tunnel ionization can be inhibited by Coulomb blocking. When ionization potentials of subsequent charge states are close to each other, multiple tunneling events can occur during a half cycle and in close proximity, so that a tunneled electron can block the next tunneling electron. In sub-nm clusters driven by near infrared single-cycle pulses, Coulomb blocking reduces two-electron sequential tunneling by up to 2-3 orders of magnitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.380
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it