MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3024481942 · doi:10.18280/rces.070102

An Adaptive Threshold Method for WMSN Image Denoising

2020· article· en· W3024481942 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueReview of Computer Engineering Studies · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoise reductionImage denoisingArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceImage (mathematics)Computer visionPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Though the wavelet threshold algorithm has been demonstrated to be a very effective tool to denoise the images with low levels of noise, it usually losses the power to well preserve meaningful details in images. To this end, this paper proposed an adaptive threshold denoising method for images that are usually interfered by noise on the Wireless Multimedia Sensor Network (WMSN). First, a scale parameter equation was defined according to different sub-band characteristics after the images were subject to wavelet decomposition, so as to determine the adaptive optimal threshold suitable for each scale level; Second, a new derivable threshold function was designed in this paper; Third, after comparison, proper wavelet basis function was selected for image denoising accordingly. Moreover, the test results on several test images proved the superiority of the proposed method over some classical methods in terms of PSNR and MSE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.833

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it