A Reliability Approach to Development of Rollover Prediction for Heavy Vehicles Based on SVM Empirical Model With Multiple Observed Variables
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid development of cooperative vehicle-infrastructure system (CVIS) improves the communication reliability between vehicles and road environment. These communications enable the accurate vehicle rollover prediction in Human-Vehicle-Road interaction. However, considering the strong non-linear characteristics of Human-Vehicle-Road interaction and the uncertainty of modeling, the traditional deterministic method cannot meet the requirement of accurate prediction of rollover hazard for heavy vehicles. In order to improve the accuracy of vehicles rollover prediction, this paper proposes a developed rollover prediction algorithm based on the multiple observed variables by combining the failure probability in reliability and the empirical model. This approach applies the probability method of uncertainty to the design of dynamic rollover prediction algorithm for heavy vehicles and establishes a classification model of heavy vehicles based on support vector machine (SVM) with multiple observed variables. The failure probability of rollover limit state of heavy vehicles is calculated by Monte Carlo Sampling (MCS), Radial-Based Importance Sampling (RBIS), and Truncated Importance Sampling (TIS), respectively. Then the Fishhook, Double Lane Change tests, and J-turn tests, simulated in TruckSim, are carried out to validate the proposed algorithm. The simulation results show that the rollover prediction algorithm based on failure probability can effectively improve the rollover prediction accuracy for heavy vehicles. Moreover, based on the communication in CVIS, the failure probability can be obtained before entering the specific road. Meanwhile, this approach can reduce the external interference of strong non-linear characteristics of Human-Vehicle-Road interaction and the uncertainty of the modeling to the system, thus improving the prediction accuracy of active safety performance of heavy vehicles significantly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".