MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025259100

Understanding future needs of Canadian veterans.

2018· article· en· W3025259100 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Military Integration
Canadian institutionsVeterans Affairs Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVeterans AffairsMedicinePopulationMental healthGerontologyDepression (economics)DemographyAnxietyEnvironmental healthPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Planning for the future needs of Canadian veterans requires comprehensive and detailed data on the size of the Canadian veteran population and their health. This article describes current veteran population estimates and examines the health of two eras of veterans compared with the health of Canadians in general. DATA AND METHODS: This study describes the size and age structure of the Canadian veteran population forecasted by Veterans Affairs Canada (VAC). Veteran health was examined for two eras of Regular Force veterans. The health of earlier-era veterans (released between 1954 and 2003) was examined using the 2003 Canadian Community Health Survey. The health of recent-era veterans (released between 1998 and 2012) was examined using the 2013 Life After Service Survey. Health indicators for veterans were compared with the Canadian general population using age- and sex-adjusted rates and confidence intervals. RESULTS: The VAC forecast points to a stable population of about 600,000 veterans for the next decade, but a growing proportion will be older than 70 years old. Regular Force veterans of both eras had a higher prevalence than the Canadian general population of activity limitations and back problems, a lower prevalence of low income, and a similar prevalence of life stress and heavy drinking. Recent-era veterans had a higher prevalence than the Canadian general population of many more indicators-in particular, arthritis, self-rated mental health, depression and anxiety. DISCUSSION: Veterans differed from the Canadian general population in many areas of well-being, and recent-era veterans differed in more areas than earlier-era veterans. These results highlight the need for forecasting and planning, and for policy that is sensitive to these differences and incorporates health status changes as veterans age. Multiple data sources will be required to describe the future health needs of the entire Canadian veteran population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score0.605

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.147
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it