Prognostics of Health Measures for Machines With Aging and Dynamic Cumulative Damage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modern engineering components generally work under aging and dynamic cumulative damage processes. To prevent failures of such components, the proportional hazards model (PHM) was proposed to integrate both processes for health prognostics. However, the existing PHMs use constant damage rate within monitoring intervals for machine health estimation and still lack consideration of dynamic operational conditions, which fails to model the practical degradation situations. This article presents a prognostic model using a new PHM to consider aging and environment-varying cumulative damage for engineering machines. A dynamic multistate process with practical transition mechanisms under varying operational conditions is presented to model the cumulative damage progress. To address the difficulties in prognostics with PHMs, a matrix-based approximation method with low computational load is developed to compute important health measures such as conditional reliability, mean residual life (MRL) and residual life distribution. A prognostic scheme featuring online prediction and dynamic updating is presented. The particularity of the proposed model is that it considers dynamic environments and can be applied to a large number of deteriorating states. The proposed approach is illustrated using a case of pump under different operating environments, and comparison with other advanced PHM is given to validate the applicability and effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".